The Emasculation of America

The Case Against Feminism:

EmasculationOfAmerica.com

Street Address

City, State & Zip

Phone & Fax

Email Address

Ref.: Case # 07052042

July 22, 2005

Doug Baker

John E. Nigro

Supervisory Equal Opportunity Specialist

U. S. Department of Education

Office of Civil Rights—Region VII

8930 Ward Parkway—Ste. 2037

Kansas City, MO  64114-3302

 

Dear Mr. Nigro:

 

             When I had not heard from your staff, I called Jim Moynihan yesterday. I was pleasantly surprised to learn from him today that my case was still “under review and not final.” However, he offered no information as to its status, or where and by whom it was being reviewed.

             I say I was pleased, not because there is any joy in waiting without concrete feedback, but because this means there is still a chance the U.S. Dept. of Education may have courage to take a politically volatile stand and right the incredible injustices against male students and men occurring at StLCC, and just about every other institution of higher education in America.

             Once its style is understood, finding proof that flagrant discriminatory falsehoods exists on our campuses is easy because it’s almost all in writing. And the sex-balanced data is just as easily found. It’s often cunningly buried within the content of the discriminatory material itself, as well as readily available in every school library and some textbooks. As indicated, the false sex-stereotyping students learn in most social-science-based courses is later taught to the public when those students become reporters, ad-copy writers, authors, editors, media moguls, PR people, entertainers, teachers, counselors, therapists, politicians, public servants, sales persons, police officers, lawyers, judges, or administrators who supervise such professionals.

             Feminism is but the sparkling tip of a potentially lethal iceberg—shining, I hope, in the light of a “new day’s” morning sun—lying in the path of our Ship-of-State. For your further consideration, I enclose two one-page essays that elaborate on the mechanisms and context that enables these kinds of false and discriminatory practices to exist. Virtually unnoticed and unopposed, a quasi-scientific and religion-like belief system (see “Scientific Materialism”)—that veils itself in the cloth of facts and truth (see “Social Science”) - has gradually taken intellectual control over much of our education system. Social science’s shortfalls are due to envy (i.e. of the escalating status of physical science over the last 200 years), arrogance (the conviction that people can be manipulated and societies reengineered), and a myopic fixation on waging a virtual war against the human soul/spirit (i.e. organized religion) for the last several centuries.

             There is much ado today about political bias pervading our schools and the media, as well as a general sense of culture-wide separatism. I suggest that the divisiveness and polarization now characterizing our society—whether gender/sex, psychosocial, religious, or political—is not a conflict between the philosophic left and right. Instead, it derives from the mindset being inculcated by the same underlying force supporting Feminism—human pseudo-science.

            

Sincerely,

 

Doug Baker

Enclosures (2)

CC: James Moynihan